Best movie of this year hands down!

Great visuals, story delivers no surprises

While it is a pity that the story wasn't told with more visual finesse, this is trivial compared to our real-world problems. It takes a good movie to put that into perspective.

It's a movie as timely as it is provocative and amazingly, for much of its running time, it is weirdly funny.

Entertaining film, but badly miscast in my opinion. I couldn't take the nearly 40 year old Forest Whitaker seriously in either the hit-man or samurai context. Isaach De Bankole was great though, lost in translation with his ice cream. I think the film would have worked better if these actors had swapped roles... The mafia guys were either ridiculously cliched or bizarrely comical. The greatest scenes were heavily inspired by better films. The emotional moments fell a bit flat for me, the ending especially didn't hold the weight if should have.

"Ghost Dog" feels incomplete. In fact, it feels as though it were hardly started - the film contains an interesting premise in a hit-man who upholds the honoured samurai code in a world of dishonour and cruelty, as well as a unique blend of various subcultures - Italian Mafia, Hip Hop, and ancient Japan. Yet this is all the film is: a premise. The characters are skeletal outlines, composed only of duties and interests - there's no psychology or actual character present. The plot is where the film's stunted composure is most noticeable - the themes set to be explored are merely included. The Hip Hop culture is present, to its fullest extents, through thinly scattered moments involving gang members and freestylers. It is most present, however, through the soundtrack - although this soundtrack is well made, it is merely played over long transitional scenes, and hence feels like a shallow and cheap attempt at including the Hip Hop culture within the narrative. The Italian Mafia are explored through the main opposition to the film's eponymous character - yet they are clichéd, dull, and wholly non-threatening. At no point within the film do the Mafia feel as though they possess any sort of presence to be reckoned with, and the various figureheads within the organisation serve only as targets for Ghost Dog, and little more. This notion is accentuated by the regard in which Ghost Dog wipes out the entirety of his opponents in one fell swoop, with little to no resistance. Finally, the Samurai code - Bushido - is explored. This is one of the most lackluster aspects of the film - rather than create a story, within which our main character is cast and navigates through in accordance with the Samurai sense of honour, we find a plot constructed purely for the sake of enacting certain Samurai codes. The plot is initiated by an entirely arbitrary event - Ghost Dog is sent to kill a member of the mafia for sleeping with the boss's partner, who is meant to have left town by this point. Yet, for some reason - never revealed - she hasn't, and Ghost Dog must be taken out, as he has executed a member of the Mafia, and this is the way they operate. This event occurs at the very beginning of the film, and is what sets the narratives path in motion. From here, various excerpts from the book, Hagakure, are read out by Ghost Dog, and almost immediately after a scene plays out that is set to present Ghost Dog specifically practicing the mindset taught within that particular excerpt. This is how the entire film plays out, and it feels as though the writer selected specific excerpts from Hagakure, and adapted these excerpts into bare-bone scenes. In fact, with this particular book mentioned, Hagakure serves as the manifestation of the film's attempts at exploring the Samurai way - rather than infuse the narrative with the theme to be explored, it is contained within and read aloud from a single book. The film also attempts to deepen its narrative with several references, often through other books owned by the characters, yet these are only references, and not symbols or points of interest in any regard. In regards to the visual aspects of the film - they are amateur at best. The cinematography is unremarkable, and the editing often indulges in lazy attempts at stylisation. Also, the direction of fight scenes within the film is awful, with the annihilation of the mafia serving as the only actual scene of this criteria. Mafioso appear from behind walls, point their guns towards Ghost Dog, and are promptly killed. There is no tension whatsoever, and the feeling is of the main antagonists of the film merely being deflated. Over all, "Ghost Dog" serves as an interesting premise, yet the lazy writing and shallow attempts at stylisation leave the film as a blueprint, and shoddily presented one at that too.

This Jarmusch film needs to be compared with Jean-Pierre Melville's 1967 French film "Le Samourai" because both stories are essentially the same. Further both films have birds playing a major role. Both films have a female witness to a key assassination. Both films have the assassin stealing cars.Thankfully the Jarmusch film shows birds returning to thank the humans and the bonding is key. For Melville, the bird seemed to have intelligence and communicated to the human through unusual twittering. Jarmusch was probably closer to reality here.Jarmusch succeeds where Melville failed by adding philosophy, interesting supporting characters--the ice cream vendor and the smart girl who carries books in her lunch box. Melville merely reduced the story to a cop and an assassin trying to resolve the respective mysteries.

The best formula for making a movie is K.I.S.S. (keep it simple stupid).This movie keeps it simple and doesn't have a lot of complicated plot twists. It is straight forward and goes from point A to point B with out much problem.There are a couple of scenes which I believe could have been dropped, such as the "black bear hunters" and the "woman highway patrol". I really don't know why they left them in the movie. They really weren't needed and I think they bring the movie down a couple of notches.There were several other scenes which I think were just filler and thankfully I could fast forward through them. All of these "filler" scenes are the long drawn out "driving in the car with the radio on". Really? Was the script that short?There are extremely minimal special effects used. There is a lot of shooting (chest, legs, arms) but you don't see a ton of blood. The violence is very mild.There are some minor factual errors in the movie, which have already been stated on this website. There are others, but they aren't important enough to post.Acting 1 Directing .5 Plot 1 Action .5 Continuity 0 Factuality 03 of 6