Sinister 2
A young mother and her twin sons move into a rural house that's marked for death.
-
- Cast:
- James Ransone , Shannyn Sossamon , Lea Coco , Tate Ellington , John Beasley , Lucas Jade Zumann , Nicholas King
Similar titles
Reviews
For all the hype it got I was expecting a lot more!
Tells a fascinating and unsettling true story, and does so well, without pretending to have all the answers.
It's the kind of movie you'll want to see a second time with someone who hasn't seen it yet, to remember what it was like to watch it for the first time.
The movie turns out to be a little better than the average. Starting from a romantic formula often seen in the cinema, it ends in the most predictable (and somewhat bland) way.
Never saw one big disparity between two sequel movies like these... The Sinister 2 looks like a very amateur movie... Very disappointing...
A single mom, Courtney (Shannyn Sossamon), wanting a fresh start, moves her 9-year old twins Dylan (Robert Daniel Sloan) and Zach (Dartanian Sloan), into a rural home that seems marked for death. Courtney is unaware of the home's dark legacy until a hideous demonic spirit (Nicholas King) makes his presence known. And he has a reputation for seeking children's souls. A young deputy (James Ransone), knowing what has previously happened at the location, tries to warn the new dwellers about foreboding misery and death.Other players include: Tate Ellington, John Beasley, Lea Coco, Laila Haley and Michael Woods.
Modern horror sequels are often failures. I thought that as the first film wasn't great that I wouldn't be as disappointed if this film turned out to be bad. I was wrong, Compared to this, the first instalment was a masterpiece and this made me realise how it was successful at achieving its goals sometimes.'Sinister 2' was quite scary in places. No doubt, the cinema playing the film super loud helped elevate the jump scares though. The creepy depictions of murder in the first film were crazily overdone in this.The screenplay was terrible. The main story was stale and predictable and the characters were unsympathetic and cold.The performances were poor all over this film in particularly the ghost children seemed like they were performing a rubbish school pantomime.Overall, I can't be too surprised with what I thought of this film but, sadly, I can see sequels for this being churned out more and more in the future.
This movie was absolute rubbish. I'd be generous if I were to call it a scary movie because it was far from that. It was a drama with some scary parts--if that much.Buguul is after new prey and he's found them. A mother has ran away from her extremely abusive ex-husband and she has her two sons in tow. One of these two sons is chosen for the deed of offing his family. The majority of the movie is exposition about the mom, her ex, and the one ex machina character that is trying to prevent the next massacre. It is so bogged down with drama and visible ghosts that you wonder if they're even trying for horror. I contend that they were not. I think they figured they wouldn't be able to make a good horror sequel anyway so why try. Let's just use the same title, the same antagonist and somewhat of the same plot, throw in a couple of very unlikeable characters and then people will lap it up. This movie was lazy, over the top and just plain hard to watch. If everyone was killed in this drivel I would have been more inclined to applaud. There was no mystery to uncover, there were no characters that were beloved and there was nothing scary about this movie. It was sinister what they did to the viewers.