Pretty good movie overall. First half was nothing special but it got better as it went along.

This is one of the few movies I've ever seen where the whole audience broke into spontaneous, loud applause a third of the way in.

This is a gorgeous movie made by a gorgeous spirit.

An old-fashioned movie made with new-fashioned finesse.

No one sets out to make a bad movie, but I think this film had to have fallen short of what the filmmakers intended. One sign that they felt the script wasn't delivering the punch needed was the number of times the stars shed their clothes.It's a pretty complex plot, and is the prelude to the story of "Jane Eyre". Set in the 1830's, it involves two generations of women living on a plantation in Jamaica. Antoinette Cosway (Karina Lombard), like her mother before her, marries an English gentleman; in her case this is Edward Rochester (Nathaniel Parker). She has been given the estate on the proviso that she marry an Englishman to manage it. For a while, Edward and Antoinette are happy, and can't leave each other alone, having many a sweaty encounter in the candlelit bedroom.Then everything starts to unravel; the madness that runs in Antoinette's family begins to overwhelm her, and there is trouble with the servants. Edward has another hot and sweaty encounter in the bedroom, but this time it's with one of the servant girls. Edward heads off to England and it all ends in tears, flames and madness.The over-the-top quality of the whole thing does give the film a certain energy, and there is frisson in naked trysting to the beat of voodoo drums, but there is a lot in the film that just doesn't gel.Narration can be a lazy way to tell a story in movies. Although it has worked beautifully in some films, it seems laboured and overly literate in this one. The script problems are not helped by the awkwardness of the lead actors.The film includes real locations in England and Jamaica but are shot in a very straightforward and unimaginative way. The actors and extras look as though they are simply dressed up - they don't inhabit the era at all.Even the real sailing ships sit statically in calm waters, giving little sense of having crossed vast distances. This is a film that needed a touch of art directorial inspiration.In fact, old studio films such as "Green Dolphin Street" or "Son of Fury", shot for the most part on the sound stage, with their sets teaming with extras and ships under full sail, caught the romance of exotic locales far better. One element that really works is Stewart Copeland's score. I was surprised to hear motifs and themes that I was familiar with from his powerful score for "Rapa Nui", composed a year later. They are more embryonic here, but contain the same blend of exotic elements with atmospheric and thematic chords. While not unwatchable by any means, the film has more than a few problems to overcome, not the least being an actress out of her depth, and little feeling for time and place.

I couldn't quite bring myself to give this film a "watch" recommendation. It fell just short, in my opinion, of a good film. Oh, it had promise. There could have been a lot more done to make this film interesting. As it was, it seemed to always be missing something.Now, I understand Jane Eyre fans know all about Edward Rochester (Nathaniel Parker) and the "mad women who lives in the attic" (Karina Lombard as Antoinette Cosway). But, not having read the books, I have to rely on the movie to tell the story. In that it fails.There are just too many unanswered questions and the ending was most unsatisfying. Maybe I could go read Jane Eye and come back, but I doubt I will.

I enjoyed watching this film. The main actress of the movie is hot. She is sexually attractive and gorgeous. She is one of the most beautiful women I saw. I wish I will afford to buy a copy of this fascinating movie.

Based on Jean Rhys' 1966 novel, "Wide Sargasso Sea" is the story of Antoinette Cosway, who shows up in Charlotte Bronte's classic 1847 novel "Jane Eyre" as Rochester's first wife Bertha Mason - confused? Rhys has taken some liberties with timelines, and some names and relationships have been changed for no apparent reason. Quibbles aside, this movie stands on its own. Gorgeous Jamaican scenery, lush erotic scenes (I think I saw the uncut version) that perfectly convey Rochester and Antoinette's passion, but a sense of foreboding (for those familiar with the Bronte book, anyway). The ending is a bit abrupt, and seems rushed after the leisurely pace of the rest of the film.Having just read Rhys' novel, I was delighted at how much of its dialogue and narrative was so faithfully adapted, and praise the screenwriters for making sense out of a rather confusing book - it jumps around in time, and is narrated by Antoinette and Rochester in turn. The movie makes the story much more clear. Excellent performances from KARINA LOMBARD(is that her real accent?) as Antoinette, NATHANIEL PARKER as Rochester, and CLAUDIA ROBINSON as Christophine (a much more sympathetic character than she appears in the book). Was also impressed with the cameos from MICHAEL YORK, RACHEL WARD and MARTINE BESWICKE.