![](https://image.chilimovie.com/region2/en/300px/20220704/wX2V0Lkea3b7ytuEZJPvMfh9CDM.jpg)
![](https://image.chilimovie.com/region2/en/300px/20220704/wX2V0Lkea3b7ytuEZJPvMfh9CDM.jpg)
![](https://image.chilimovie.com/region2/en/300px/20220704/wX2V0Lkea3b7ytuEZJPvMfh9CDM.jpg)
Mysteries
In the winter of 1891 a stranger arrives in a small coastal town on the Isle of Man. His presence soon disturbs the lives of the local inhabitants, especially the beautiful daughter of the parson.
-
- Cast:
- Rutger Hauer , Sylvia Kristel , David Rappaport , Rita Tushingham , Andréa Ferréol , Fons Rademakers , Marina de Graaf
![](https://statics.madeinlink.com/ImagesFile/movie_banners/201807091325582049.jpg)
![](https://statics.madeinlink.com/ImagesFile/movie_banners/201706131846483364.png)
Similar titles
Reviews
Plenty to Like, Plenty to Dislike
Don't listen to the Hype. It's awful
The storyline feels a little thin and moth-eaten in parts but this sequel is plenty of fun.
All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.
You want a real mystery? Another reviewer on this board states he's watched this film more than ten times! No disrespect intended, but that is simply well beyond my scope to fathom. I guess if you're a Rutger Hauer fan you might find it interesting to see him in a vehicle where he's not an action hero or sinister villain, but to me he looked like a duck out of water. I'm glad he stood up for the midget though, he should have cracked a few more heads while he was at it. But that bizarre scene near the end with the naked maid seemed more creepy than anything else. Maybe I just didn't have the patience for this. A couple of other writers on this board seem to have a more profound understanding of the picture than I do, and they make their case well enough. For me, this was just a mystery.
of a wonderful book. Rutger Hauer is at his best. The only thing that puzzled me was the ending, I did not understand the need to change the original ending of the book, it just doesn't make sense.This film is very rare to find, but not the book, so if you want to read a masterpiece, here's your chance.
have watched this movie over 10 times but I still do not get what is going on. I want to believe that the movie tried to follow the book but failed eithier due to budget cuts or crappy editing. I am guessing a combo. The performance of Danny is laughable, Hauer tries to be good, Rappaport excellent. To tell you the truth, Rappaport is the only reason I watched the film in the first place. His performance stands out from all others and was great. Anyway, If you are not a diehard fan of any of the actors, do not watch it. Not worth anyones time.
I was happily surprised when I noticed this hard-to-find film at my local video store, since movies based on Knut Hamsun's novels are hard to come by here in the States. I'm also happy to say that this film did not disappoint. My wife and I both enjoyed it immensely.Dutch is the original language of the film, and unfortunately they decided to dub it rather than add the less distracting subtitles. This does mar the film (when doesn't it?), but it stopped irritating me after 15 minutes or so, when I got used to it. Other than that, this movie has everything going for it. I hope that someday they will issue another version with subtitles.Based on a novel of the Norwegian Nobel prize-winner, Knut Hamsun, this romantic psychological drama takes place during the last century and depicts a wealthy mysterious traveller, Johan Nagel (Hauer), who decides to make an extended stay in a small rural town. He becomes the immediate friend and protector of the town's much-abused midget (played wonderfully by David Rappaport), and is tormented by his feelings for two local women -- the beautiful yet spiteful and unattainable Dany Kielland (Sylvia Kristel) and the beautiful and innocent Martha Gude (Rita Tushingham). The movie was shot on location on the Isle of Man, and the picturesque natural scenery throughout adds greatly to the rich atmosphere of the film. (Nature is a prime element in Hamsun's novels.) As far as the sex goes, there are some suggestive scenes and nudity, but nothing too explicit. It's mostly left to the imagination, which is nice (quite unlike most Dutch films I've seen). The acting I thought was first-rate, and Rutger Hauer is well-cast as the unfathomable Johan Nagel. It was interesting to see Hauer in his younger days, before he crossed the Atlantic to follow his career in Hollywood.American audiences may not take too well to this film, being that its style is very European. It reminded me of some of Ingmar Bergman's works or the recent "Breaking The Waves". However, those who have the capacity and patience to appreciate great art will be well rewarded.