Waste of time

Simply Perfect

Although I seem to have had higher expectations than I thought, the movie is super entertaining.

Actress is magnificent and exudes a hypnotic screen presence in this affecting drama.

The problem with Alex Jones and other conspiracy theorists is their failure to account for multiple lines of causation and accidental trends based on human nature, which provide an Occam's Razor explanation that requires no conspiracies. Sure, there are some people plotting bad things behind the scenes, but they tend to be in scattered groups with limited power.But Jones sees conspiracies everywhere and forces disparate pieces of evidence to fit that assumption. He inserts just enough truth to hook gullible minds and fellow sufferers of the "Dunning-Kruger effect." It does take a certain cleverness to invent compelling twists and turns, but it's not wise cleverness. Jones seems to be a megalomaniac who wants people to think he's got the ultimate insight. Conspiracy theorists find rational explanations boring, so he'll always have an audience.The New World Order (a phrase taken out of context from old speeches) can be explained by trends in global commerce, encouraged by economic growthism that chases dwindling natural resources and finds "emerging markets" as existing ones play out. It may seem like they want to control people, but they mostly want to exploit physical matter around the globe. There is no need to layer mysteries on top of the natural human tendency toward gluttony and resource pillaging. Most of it is happening in plain sight.Regarding Jones' theories on population-control, it shouldn't take a vast NWO plot to notice that Man is overloading the Earth's carrying capacity and we need to lower birthrates to replacement levels ASAP. Nature will kill off (and already is killing off) millions of people via starvation long before the "elites" can poison the water.It's reckless to portray the serious need for growth cessation as an evil conspiracy. Smart people should downsize voluntarily, given so much evidence of resource depletion. Does Jones propose that we keep adding 80 million more people each year to this finite planet indefinitely, with so much existing overload? Historical genocides are often linked to population pressures in poor regions, even though they get passed off as "politics." Study root causes of the Rwanda massacre, for example.Jones also seems to be an evolution denier, and dismisses the science behind global warming in favor of conspiratorial plots. The notion that thousands of climate scientists have been colluding to raise taxes and control people is ludicrous (the CO2 warming effect was first noticed in the 1800s). AGW was all about physics until the lunatic Right grabbed the issue. Jones' interpretation of such things reveals his "scientific" thought process, which is anything but. He was at his best as an animated character in a Linklater film, and should have stuck with dark comedy.

How do I know that Alex Jones is for real? I know this because the mainstream media here in Canada criticizes him. On average I think that Americans are friendlier than Canadians, maybe because they haven't been under British rule for a long time.Now here's the gist.This is another in a series of quite popular films by Alex Jones which attempt to reveal the plans of the globalists. Is it worth watching? You bet it is, but keep in mind that the film is meant to educate Americans. Jones is no Michael Moore when it comes to documentary filmmaking, but his films are quite good. The information he reveals, however, is much more important than what Moore talks about. In his films Moore doesn't question the official version of events but Alex Jones does. What's revealed in Endgame is sinister. If you know real history, however, it's not really surprising. As much as I like Jones's radio show he's not the only source of information that I have about the goings-on of the Western elite. One important thing that I know about Anglo-Saxons is that they're good chess players when it comes to global politics and economics. If you add to them the Jewish elite then they become one seriously cunning and formidable force. Actually, the alliance between Anglo-Saxons and Jews dates back to Queen Victoria's time. It was then that the English agreed to intermarriage between the Anglo-Saxon and Jewish elites. I'm not an anti-Semite but facts are facts. It's quite possible that the Mossad played an important role in the 9/11 attacks. When it was founded the United States used to be independent of these people. But over time, and especially during the 20th century, America came under the influence of the British. In many ways America is now the strong arm of the global elite. Their plans for a global government are quite something, but recently I've been hearing that this scheme may not actually work. Even if it doesn't work what's currently going on isn't good for America or the world. After the dissolution of the Soviet Union the Western elite don't even have to try anymore. In some ways the existence of the USSR was seriously beneficial for ordinary people in the West. But now the elite often don't conceal their intentions, with one individual saying that he'd like to be reborn as a virus that can kill most of the world's population. The Western elite, or the 1%, live in their own world, and nowadays they have nothing in common with the 99%.I like the theory of civilizations, which is explained by Carroll Quigley in his books. A world government would certainly be beneficial for the corporatocracy. These days Western capitalists just can't accumulate wealth like they used to. China certainly gave them a helping hand by becoming their workshop and creditor, and if the situation in China becomes unstable then they can move their business to India. India is, in many ways, the ideal place for exploitation because there have been very few peasant revolts there. This is because of India's caste system. India is the most fascist state in the world, and an Indian of one class has no hope of becoming a member of a higher class. Anyway, for now the plan is to reduce the world's population by 90% and to reduce the level of education so that the world would be a lot easier to govern with a global dictatorship. There will be 150-200 agglomerations where life will be sweet, and between them will be spaces where even cannibals could live. Even if this frightening scheme doesn't work then we may still get a Universal Empire in which the United States will rule most of Western Civilization.

Alex Jones' documentaries are wrought with intrigue and paranoia.This is what makes them so entertaining.Once again his old enemies are afoot.The New World order are having a pow wow.The Bilderberg group,made up of major powerbrokers,bankers and leading politicians,is meeting again and Alex and his crew are picketting the meeting and reporting on those arriving at the meeting. Of course this is just a springboard for Jones'delivery of information about the global elite who control the planet and manipulate wars on the planet to accrue wealth. Top stuff if you like this sort of thing.Yes,the truth is out there and fascinating when presented by the likes of Conspiracy Celeb Alex Jones.

This film is a great example of 'How NOT to produce a documentary'. Documentary films typically offer factual presentation of arguments, not blatant examples of innuendo building upon suspicion and leading to speculation. Specious arguments do not contribute to logical, reasoned and informed opinion. There may indeed, be good reason to suspect secret and/or restricted organizations, such as the Bilderberg Group, but presenting them by silly name-calling and strange assumptions proves little more than the name-caller is not very well informed.I also note the absence of 'Goofs' category on IMDb's movie info for Endgame and agree that it ought not to be included as the number of 'goofs' clearly outweigh the number of so-called 'facts' presented in this film.I would like to offer the producer/director a paraphrased quote from the late Carl Sagan - Belief, in the absence of compelling evidence is known as faith/truth; belief after the acquisition of evidence is known as knowledge. He may wish to gather a little more of the latter for his next endeavor.