Sorry, this movie sucks

Plot so thin, it passes unnoticed.

Horrible, fascist and poorly acted

The movie is made so realistic it has a lot of that WoW feeling at the right moments and never tooo over the top. the suspense is done so well and the emotion is felt. Very well put together with the music and all.

This short drama inspired Porter's "The Great Train Robbery" as also did Haggar's "Desperate Poaching Affray." Of the two films, this one is probably better as there is generally more action and it is more involved. It must have been successful when first released.It is easy to see how this inspired Porter's masterpiece. There are several similarities. For one thing, Porter's idea for the fireman to be hurled off the engine obviously came from the part in here where the thief hurls the policeman off the roof. Additionally, it also includes the getaway by train which is not only reminiscent of "The Great Train Robbery", but also of "The Bold Bank Robbery" which was made by Lubin a year later, I believe. Other than this, it is pretty much the typical "thieves try to rob and later get caught" scenario, with a few elaborations.Thus, this film was more of an inspiration than "Desperate Poaching Affray" was. For the time it's pretty impressive with some nice scenery and photography.

Historian Barry Salt makes some fine points on this one; its fluidity of shots to create exciting action surely do owe much to James Williamson's films, including "Stop Thief!" and "Fire!" (both 1901). In turn, "A Daring Daylight Burglary", in addition to similar British crime chases at the time, such as "A Desperate Poaching Affray", had a significant influence on Edwin S. Porter's "The Great Train Robbery" (1903). British filmmakers, like Robert W. Paul, George Albert Smith, James Williamson and the fellows who made this film, were at the forefront of inventing film techniques and grammar in the beginning of cinema's history.Perhaps, the earliest crime chase was the aforementioned "Stop Thief!" Comparing it to these later incarnations illustrates what the genre did in establishing continuity editing and other film techniques. "Stop Thief!" breaks the rule the axis of action of direction across the screen (a rule not yet invented): when characters exit the frame to the right, for example, in one shot, they enter the next shot at the right, rather than from the left. Williamson may have been imitating the grammar of theatre here, since there was no precedent in cinema. In subsequent films, including the 10-shot "A Daring Daylight Burglary", however, action is continuous by association of shots through continuity editing.The thread from "Fire!" to this film and then to "The Great Train Robbery", with other films in between, is also demonstrated in their "operational aesthetic" (as historian Neil Harris phrased it). Like "The Great Train Robbery", this film presents the violent actions in a straightforward and distant manner because of the aesthetic of showing the details, the operations, of the events. The same sort of curiosity was at work in "Fire!", where the operations of firemen are shown in detail. Thus, we have to see exactly how the injured policeman is taken away before the film resumes with the chase. Two other particular similarities between this film and "The Great Train Robbery" are that they both feature an escape by train, and in a fight scene in each, a substitution splice is used for the tossing of an obvious dummy.

I watched this film on a DVD that was rammed with short films from the period. I didn't watch all of them as the main problem with these type of things that their value is more in their historical novelty value rather than entertainment. So to watch them you do need to be put in the correct context so that you can keep this in mind and not watch it with modern eyes. With the Primitives & Pioneers DVD collection though you get nothing to help you out, literally the films are played one after the other (the main menu option is "play all") for several hours. With this it is hard to understand their relevance and as an educational tool it falls down as it leaves the viewer to fend for themselves, which I'm sure is fine for some viewers but certainly not the majority. What it means is that the DVD saves you searching the web for the films individually by putting them all in one place – but that's about it.Worth remembering the role that Britain had in the development of silent cinema and this impressive film is one way to remember it. This is a chase film about a botched robbery (100 years later and we're still making 'em!) that goes across rooftops, streets and train stations. It is quite thrilling even now to watch and I imagine back in the day it must have been quite something to have seen this action movie that runs to five minutes. Technically it is impressive and the selection, framing and editing of shots makes the film flow really well.It won't amaze modern viewers but to help put it in perspective think about how the Bourne films have gripped and thrilled audiences with their movement and action – now imagine the impact this must have had on viewers back when it came out. Impressive.

This is probably my favourite of the early cinema classics, an exciting action narrative that inspired Edwin S. Porter in making his masterpiece, 'The Great Train Robbery'. The title says everything you need to know about the plot - a man tries to burgle a country house in the middle of the day; the police are roused and chase is given. this is brilliantly done in terms of editing, with some excellent chases and fistfights. But what makes 'Burglary' special is the manner of its filming, which manages to give its genre mechanics a Surrealist quality that would later flourish with Feuillade's 'Fantomas'. The robbery takes place in a real, rather than a stylised environment. Many crime films try, of course, to be gritty and realistic, set in genuine locales, but end up seeming less so because genre and its rules are not like life. This film doesn't try to adapt its genre to its setting, creating an eerie clash. What's more, although the setting is real, it's not common, but a run-down country-house, overgrown with brambles, dead branches and the like, contributing to the rarefied atmosphere. Add to this the purity of the plot, shorn of bogus 'psychologising' and extraneous plotting, just criminal and police, and you already see the bones of what would become Feuillade's unheimliche cinema.This would be more than enough, but than something really extraordinary happens. In the middle of the chase, a policeman is knocked over as he climbs over a large wall in a deserted country lane. Obviously, there are a couple of frames missing, because magically carriages appear, out of nowhere, like something out of Sjostrom's 'Phantom Carriage'. What's more, most of the traffic ignore the stricken lawman! So, here is a film where generic grounding and certainties are pushed towards surrealism, fantasy, absurdity, eight years before 'Fantomas' the novel was ever written. A masterpiece.