Terrible acting, screenplay and direction.

So much average

Good movie but grossly overrated

Don't listen to the negative reviews

One of the most artfully filmed movies - very much surreal. This is also one the best films roles for Anthony Perkins, he's perfectly and rightfully cast.Imagine waking up and the police are in your room, you are told you are under arrest - but not in the traditional sense of the words "under arrest". Imagine you are made to stand trial for and never knowing what the charges are against you. You have to defend yourself without knowing what you are defending yourself against. This has happened to Josef K. (Perkins) in this dramatically bizarre, twisted mystery-thriller.9/10

This film has a surrealistic language, a transcendentalist style, Wells' iconoplasticism, Kafka's philosophical anthropology, poetic imaging, and existentialist reflection.It is historically, culturally, politically and philosophically relevant.It is also relevant for cinematography studies (for its brilliant use of different lenses, lighting and composition of the shots), for actor directing studies (for the non naturalistic performances that make the film consistent) and film directing studies (for the non transparency of the style, representation and meaning).It should be in the top of the IMDb list so that everyone could know that they should absolutely see it as soon as possible.It is a remarkable achievement in film

Its hard to compose a hard hitting film when so much media is out there challenging and criticising contemporary power structures. Orson Welles' film communicates the feeling of ambiguous persecution which is the product of state surveillance. He doesn't understand the reason for his trial because there is no viable reason other than the legality of it. If what we do is simply governed by laws and legal code then human moral code becomes useless; human moral code has broken down and K sees that the other accused citizens have become 'nothing more than dogs' to the system. In the same way that we are today obedient to authority and lack the ability to liberate ourselves from structures of control K conforms to the will of the authority due to a vague threat of violence."No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks." Universal Declaration Of Human Rights, article 12.You as a citizen of the western media empire are likely the victim of authority and systems of control. Systems that worm their way into your psyche and cause you to self regulate and become demoralised. The victims of a surveillance aesthetic mentality, many subsist under fear of the chimera of surveillance organisations and corporate-government control.Don't believe me, look a little deeper down the rabbit hole: https://wikileaks.org/"You may object that it is not a trial at all; you are quite right, for it is only a trial if I recognise it as such. But for the moment I do recognise it, on grounds of compassion, as it were. One can't regard it except with compassion, if one is to regard it at all. I do not say that your procedure is contemptible, but I should like to present that epithet to you for your private consumption." (The Trial, Kafka)

The logic of this film is the logic of a dream.It's surreal, complicated and does give very less breathing space to contemplate what has happened. Made by a film aficionado for film aficionados, this is a highly intellectual interpretation of what Franz Kafka wrote. There are reasons why only Orson Welles could attempt this, without any compromise. Also, only why he could understand it and interpret it the way he did. Orson Welles perhaps, has many similarities with Kafka. From being eccentric and extremely passionate about his art to having a similar surreal psyche that is left for the interpretation of the audience than being spoon-fed. From the cast to the settings, to the humongous number of extras used, this film has a grandeur which can also be stated as grandeur of delusions. A door opens another one and we do not know if all that was happening was real or a mere illusion. Such is the script that it never made me wake up from the times I watched it. I watched it thrice and will watch it many times more. There is so much happening and so much has been said that it took me time to even get a grasp of it. I must admit I read the book only after watching this film. I watched it thrice till date. The first time, it shook me. Second time, it gave me some insights. Third time, I was awestruck as I got to understand a few details deeply. Perhaps, this is still not right for me to review this film coz there are many more things that I ought to know in the process of understanding this film. Kafka is probably one of the most complicated writers of 19th century. While other writers used lot of verbiage to elucidate the details, Kafka used less words and said so much more. The translators of Kafka's works should be hugely applauded for they would have gone through a lot of pain in getting us the right meaning and in the appropriate context. Getting back to the film, this has great set pieces and Orson Welles proves yet again that why is grandeur a must to show a film in a certain way. It adds intrigue, mystique and a certain sense of being there. The scene where K escapes from the the painter and the way it has been shot, is just magnificent. Welles knows how to use camera, art design, and the setup the sets with the shots in mind meticulously.Hey, is this a movie review? I really doubt coz after reading, I felt like I reviewed Kafka and Orson Welles more than the movie "The Trial" itself. Nevertheless, I can simply say it is one of the most profound surreal films that will be ever made.A 5/5 for one of the finest films by a master director.http://braddugg.blogspot.in/search/label/Movie%20Review