What the Peeper Saw
A wealthy author's second wife begins to suspect that her 12-year old stepson may have murdered his mother, who mysteriously died in a bathtub accident.
-
- Cast:
- Mark Lester , Britt Ekland , Hardy Krüger , Lilli Palmer , Harry Andrews , Conchita Montes , Colette Giacobine
Similar titles
Reviews
This movie is the proof that the world is becoming a sick and dumb place
If you don't like this, we can't be friends.
Excellent adaptation.
This movie feels like it was made purely to piss off people who want good shows
After moving into her husbands' house, a stepmother begins to get increasingly concerned about his sons' growing psychotic behavior that becomes eerily similar to the antics that killed his first wife and begins to fear for her safety around him.This was quite the disturbing if flawed effort overall. What really tends to work here for this one is the fact that there's a rather sleazy tone present in a retelling of a rather familiar story. With the film exploring the familiar set-up involving her arrival alongside his return home that gradually leads to the discovery of even darker activities just within the surface, that allows this one to adapt plenty of sleazy thrills into this one that makes for a rather appropriate fit into the times. The general scenes of her nude, either walking through the house after showering or lounging about in barely-there swimsuits are fine enough, but to include the scenes of her being actively fondled while on the phone or the stand-out scene of being forced to strip completely naked in front of him all gives it a rather depraved tone and feel which is quite apparently a sign of the times. Given that this is all tied together with the more traditional elements found in the adaptation of the original story, it goes along quite nicely with the stories of his deviant behavior at the school, the mysteriously quiet nature of his general appearance and the growing paranoia experienced by the thought that he's targeting her for the same reasons to really build up the thriller aspects of the storyline. That also leaves the film into quite a rousing final half which comes with some rather fun times here as she finally learns the truth indulging in a series of fantasies about what to do to him and finally leading into the final revelation that makes for quite a nice finale. Even with these positives, there are a few flaws to be found here. The biggest issue here is the film's rather dramatic sense of pacing, tending to feature more in the way of straightforward drama rather than any kind of horrific activity. It's all basically the idea that he's done these terrible things yet never follows through or shows any of it happening, forcing this one to go nearly it's entire running time before any kind of action actually occurs as nearly all the scenes of her running around trying to find out the truth indeed build up the mystery without anything actually happening causing this one to be incredibly boring at times. Nowhere else is this most evident than in the encounter with the psychiatrist which is so bland and dull despite all the revelations coming out that there's nothing all that enjoyable about it that comes to pass from it. The other main flaw here is the fact that this one is so obviously based on the famous adaptation of the main story that it feels way too predictable throughout here, going from familiar set-up to familiar set-up without any deviation which makes for a rather routine affair here. This is due mainly to the idea that she's being made out to be crazy and nothing she says is the truth, which is quite the familiar storyline here and this one running so close to that storyline. These here are what really hold this one back.Rated Unrated/R: Full Nudity, Language, Mild Violence and sexual situations including erotic teasing of a minor.
This is one of those psychological chillers which gradually creeps up on you, starting off slowly and later turning into something very strong indeed. It's an ultra-rare obscurity which has one of the most sinister children ever to appear on film - forget those young uns from VILLAGE OF THE DAMNED, this kid is the real thing, the spawn of the devil. Or is he? It's one of those films which doesn't feel the need to tie up loose ends - instead much is left unexplained and to your imagination. We never positively know whether the child is evil or not, only that he perhaps might be. The pacing is deceptively slow to begin with but soon builds up as more and more disturbing events begin to appear. And we've got it all in this film - voyeurism, incest - all involving the young 12 year old boy. This may sound a bit sick to you, but instead it's a decently handled film which uses the themes for the purposes of disturbing the viewer rather than disgusting him or her. In fact, there is no violence or nudity - instead, this is pure psychological horror, with little in the way of visual menace.This film scores on many levels. Filmed in Spain, there is some lovely sun-drenched scenery to look at. The camera-work is involving and rarely are there any conventional shots - all scenes are shot to show the increasing madness of the situation. The acting is top notch - from Mark Lester, excelling in the pivotal role - to Britt Ekland, who is actually VERY good as the woman who may be discovering the truth or alternatively losing her mind. Harry Andrews also pops up in a commanding cameo while Hardy Kruger lends a masculine, powerful figure to the film.This is somewhat unforgettable, dealing with adult themes which few others have dared to touch over the years. It breaks many boundaries and thereby becomes much more frightening than the conventional Hammer films of this period. It may be a little confusing towards the end, but it's a film that isn't afraid to take chances or underestimate the viewer and should be lauded for doing so. Once seen, always remembered.
For a multi national production with two directors it is amazing that this turned out so well. I just wish between everybody they could have thought up at least one good title. Never mind, it is well worth seeing anyway. Britt Ekland is outstanding in a demanding role, as to is the ex-Oliver male lead, Mark Lester. I feel Hardy Kruger lets the side down rather but as the inadvertent go-between for his son and his new wife, the role was never going to be easy. For all the difficulties not to mention lots of nudity and sex scenes involving Ekland and the boy, this is a well told tale with quite a punch. The wide spread assumption that children are innocent little things and step mothers evil, always makes for a potent storytelling and this super sleazy number is no exception.
The very dark plot could have worked, but its all too exploitative, sleazy and cheesy. As interesting as it is to see Mark Lester play a different character to that he plays in Oliver, it doesn't stop him being incredibly wooden. Also, every time something f&*ked up happens in the film, the characters show very little reaction to it, which is infuriating. Its a mess too, the end especially, which is very shocking, and was probably one of my favourite moments, but it seems almost tacked on as an afterthought it happens so randomly.Basically its just twisted soft porn (disturbingly almost verging towards child porn at times) masquerading as an intelligent thriller.Don't listen to the other reviewers, its not worth tracking down.