Savior
A hardened mercenary in the Foreign Legion begins to find his own humanity when confronted with atrocities during the fighting in Bosnia.
-
- Cast:
- Dennis Quaid , Pascal Rollin , Stellan Skarsgård , John Maclaren , Nataša Ninković , Nastassja Kinski , Sergej Trifunović
Similar titles
Reviews
Pretty good movie overall. First half was nothing special but it got better as it went along.
Clever, believable, and super fun to watch. It totally has replay value.
This is a coming of age storyline that you've seen in one form or another for decades. It takes a truly unique voice to make yet another one worth watching.
Actress is magnificent and exudes a hypnotic screen presence in this affecting drama.
Savior is not an easy film to watch. At times it's downright excruciating. But it's also beautiful, and takes its subject matter very, very seriously, with not a cliché in sight for the entire duration. It's also has the best Dennis Quaid performance in his whole career. He is a charming, roguish guy known for his million dollar smile and good natured way. Here he drops all of that for a solemn, tortured turn that leaves your heart in a vice grip and your hands gripping the chair. He plays a military operative whose wife (Natassja Kinski) and little son are slaughtered in a terrorist bombing in Paris. He promptly walks down the street to the nearest mosque, enters and shoots everyone in the place. That's in the first ten minutes of the film. As an escape route he enters a special faction of the French Foreign Legion with his buddy (Stellan Skarsgaard in an excellent but quick appearance), whose task it is to bring some kind of order to the war against n Bosnia. There he finds himself the caretaker of a Bosnian girl who was raped and is pregnant with a Muslim child. Their journey across a ruined, confusing, harrowing country in crisis is one that will give you nightmares. But amidst the horror there is humanity, and a sense that he's trying to find the force within himself, and right his path to help this girl as best he can. There are no good guys or bad guys in this one. Just people swept up by conflict and hate against their will, in constant danger of the raging genocidal fury that lies just outside their door. Quaid steers the film with his rock jawed, stoic intensity, and the girl, played by is phenomenal, her last scene a haunting exodus that will leave you with goosebumps to go along with your nausea. This is a brutal, brutal movie though. Not even in the sense of the specific violence they show, it's the cold, frank context of it that gets under the skin of your soul. But it shows that even a person who emerges from a violent, scorched past into an environment like that can make somewhat of a difference. Very overlooked war film that shows war with no filter, no glossy heroics. Just what it is.
In war movies of the more thoughtful sort, like "Saving Private Ryan," the protagonist and his friends have a goal. They rush toward it, enduring one conflict after another along the way, losing friends and sometimes the hero himself. In commercial pap, Rambo races towards the goal, is captured and tortured, escapes, and wreaks revenge. And Errol Flynn, no matter the tribulations, will wipe out the Japanese radio station and take the airfield.This movie, about the tribal warfare in the former Yugoslavia between the Serbs, the Croats, and the Muslims, doesn't adhere to the usual conventions. Dennis Quaid, older and lumpier, escapes American justice and finds himself a mercenary for the Serbs while in the French Foreign Legion. The ethnic cleansing that goes on is so general that at times it's hard to keep track of who's expelling or executing whom.One of his assignments is to pick up a Serbian woman who has been held captive by the Muslims and was deliberately made pregnant by them. Her pregnancy is intended as an insult to the Serbs and especially to the woman's family. Quaid's Serbian companion receives the insult exactly as intended. They stop the car in a tunnel and the companion kicks the woman brutally in the stomach, bringing on labor, and is about to shoot and kill both her and her baby before being shot by Quaid.Quaid drives her to her family's humble farm. The father, finding her with a Muslim baby, throws her out. The goal has been achieved. As in a typical action movie, Quaid has escorted his ward and her baby from Point A -- the prisoner exchange bridge -- to Point B -- her home. But the movie isn't nearly over. It's barely begun.Quaid drives her and the baby away, not quite knowing what to do with them, and they're both a big problem for him. The mother -- an entirely ordinary-looking woman -- hates the baby and refuses to breast feed it. She doesn't speak at all. And the baby girl herself isn't the cute kind that is likely to milk sympathy from Quaid even if not from the mother. It's a nuisance. She cries constantly because she's not fed, until Quaid improvises an instrument out of a milk bottle and a condom. She soils her wrap and Quaid curses while he washes the garment in an icy river.I don't think I'll go on with the plot. There's very little gore but an abundance of savagery and murder. And it all takes place on gravel roads, wet streets, and skies the color of dirty wool, whipped by an frigid mid-winter wind. It was mostly shot in Montenegro, near the Albanian border.I was in Albania once -- for about thirty seconds -- but it was summer, the skies were blue and the sun was warm. Nothing looked as dreary and unpromising as this. I was in Yugoslavia too, when it was one nation and Tito was in power. There wasn't this sort of insanity going on because Tito would never have permitted it. All the rules seemed to be observed. When a wedding party and its band marched through the streets of Skopje, nobody stepped off the sidewalk because a police officer would dash over and bang the miscreant's shins with his baton. Yugoslavia was a socialist dictatorship. Yet, watching this, one wonders which political arrangement is better. Maybe Thomas Hobbes was right. In some countries anyway, a strong leader is required to keep the public from each others' throats. Maybe a certain level of political evolution is necessary before ethnic or regional allegiances can be subjugated to those of the nation itself. There is, of course, no guarantee. America had its own Civil War.At any rate, I've never seen such a powerful anti-war statement before, or any movie within the genre that's quite so original in so many ways. There SHOULD be a developing romance between Quaid and the woman he's trying to save -- and there isn't. The woman herself should at least be saved -- but that doesn't happen either.It's a film made for adults and you're likely to forget in a hurry, or at least try to. Anti-war movies are supposed to end with the good guys winning. The audience should never have to leave the theater confused, as they do here and, rarely, in movies like "The Bridge on the River Kwai."
Bel film, is clearly much more spectacular of others. The trouble is that there is the category of "nostalgia", still anchored to the past that can not see the newer versions and then criticize harshly. Then there are just horrible comments under my own, if reject this movie should automatically reject the other 3 is a mechanism. What is the standard series. Violent scenes and events that unfortunately show the terrible ethnic cleansing in yugoslavia married with a desire for revenge of the viewer and the Quaid. Dennis quaid is a grat actor. beautiful film. As to the usual one, the usual negative comments which talk about a classical film some years 80 which everyone does not like it to the nostalgic ones are met.Sure Heros that this film had to have a judgment in this site. In fact reviewers' good part has put a high vote to the previous episodes. Because this contrast? I know the reason. Since assumptive reviewers' good part favorably sees the past and as the past is "better" than the present they have given several credit to the preceding episodes being still the last episode more explosive and spectacular. At this point should reject also the old episodes but there are here two weights and two measure.In fact also cinema masterpieces have been criticized and denigrated. Good part some reviewers of this site belong to the very bad reviewers. Better think separately with its head.
The quality of this film is not measured by it's oversights and errors but of the moments of brilliance. Dennis Quaid does seem to drift in and out of his best acting - who knows why - and some of the scenes are pure Hollywood convenience. But at other times the film is tight and suspense is built superbly without using dialogue. Oliver Stone is truly a master.The truth in this film is so apparent that you get the feeling that this story could be superimposed onto any war in history. The immediate black and white moral decisions that people face in war are displayed clearly; if a mistake is made, you die, that's all there is to it; knowing when assistance cannot be given is a skill to be learned; and in the end you realise that people will do it all again, having learned nothing.After toying briefly in the beginning with political world comment, this film steers clear of further judgements and side taking and moves skillfully along a path of a true people story.