Thanks for the memories!

Bad Acting and worse Bad Screenplay

Very interesting film. Was caught on the premise when seeing the trailer but unsure as to what the outcome would be for the showing. As it turns out, it was a very good film.

All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

Recap: Ron is about to marry Mel. They are deeply and love and certain they are perfect for each other even though they met just a few months ago. Todd, Ron's brother in law to be is not so happy. He is afraid the marriage is a threat to his cushy job in the family business and decides to arrange Ron's bachelor party. But his real plan is to put Ron in a compromising situation, get evidence and break Ron and Mel up.Comments: Supposed to be a sequel to a comedy classic but it isn't funny at all. It is mostly a pubertal show and a juvenile excuse to show scantily clad women. Actually, in a way, it is almost impressive have many you can put in there, because they are everywhere. Unfortunately that is also one of the signs of a movie that can't support itself. It simply isn't good enough.It has three redeeming points though, or actually three actors that is worth a better script than this. It is lead actor Josh Cooke who actually manages to give an impression of some common sense. Sara Foster I know has more talent than to do movies like this, and Emanuelle Vaugier seem to have a lot more talent than this movie.What is suspiciously absent are good jokes. Actually, bad jokes are rather scarce too. It just isn't funny.3/10

. . . but not everyone can be Tom Hanks, title character of 1984's original Bachelor Party. Josh Cooke as the remakes' groom-to-be is pretty much the straight man to everyone else appearing in this farce. However, this is a movie that could have been better had it not chosen to straddle the fence between gross-out comedy (e.g.--its unforgettable poopy diaper splattered on a bowling ball) and erotic comedy (e.g.--two horny guys unknowingly crashing a women's meeting of the Sex Addicts Anonymous group). The DVD has many deleted scenes and extended gags, several of which are as funny as anything in the feature. Too bad the baby potty wasn't confined there.

I wonder how much this movie actually has got to do with the 1984 movie "Bachelor Party", starring Tom Hanks. Is this movie even an official sequel? This movie is lacking in every department and you're obviously better off not watching it.For a comedy this movie simply isn't good or funny enough. It relies mostly on the character's their stereotypical assessments, rather then the movie actually features some good, original and funny moments.Of course there also is very little story present and the movie nude breast than script pages. You just keep waiting for things to finally start off. There is a main plot line in it somewhere but that one is so terribly unoriginal and gets executed so poorly in the movie that it feels more as if it's something non-existent. I guess there even is a message and moral story in it somewhere but this again is so terribly unoriginal and poorly done in the movie that it simply does not work out.It's basically a typical teenage comedy, with lots of sex jokes and nudity, only without the teenage main characters, which makes the story all the more sad and tasteless. The movie makes some really wrong jokes, that are misplaced for any type of movie.I regret ever watching this.3/10http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/

Now, we all know that comedy sequels that change actors, and that are made years after the original, are usually disastrous. Ski School 2 ...Caddyshack 2.Dumb and DUmberer...Major League 2. ....I'll stop there before I have bad nightmares. THis movie is actually MUCH better than I expected. Is it great?...NO!.....but it's definitely not horrible. The cast has an adequate group of known funny-men and the acting in general is passable. Doesn't disappoint on the nudity and party front...living up to its' namesake. Most of the humor is dirty.. as are the mojito's and martini's. Ratings wise I'd say it's just shy of the original, but it's worth a view for a guys' night in with a case of brewskies. 54-100