Oliver!
Musical adaptation of Charles Dickens' Oliver Twist, a classic tale of an orphan who runs away from the workhouse and joins up with a group of boys headed by the Artful Dodger and trained to be pickpockets by master thief Fagin.
-
- Cast:
- Ron Moody , Shani Wallis , Oliver Reed , Harry Secombe , Mark Lester , Jack Wild , Joseph O'Conor
Similar titles
Reviews
the audience applauded
I like movies that are aware of what they are selling... without [any] greater aspirations than to make people laugh and that's it.
The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.
One of the film's great tricks is that, for a time, you think it will go down a rabbit hole of unrealistic glorification.
For a long time it was assumed that there were certain film genres which we Brits just didn't do. These included Westerns (obviously) and also cartoons; "Animal Farm" from 1954 was the first British animated feature, and for a long time thereafter about the only one anyone could name. And musicals. Although plenty of musicals were written for the West End stage, few of these ever found their way onto the screen. There were musicals set in Britain, like "My Fair Lady" and "Mary Poppins", but both were made in America by American studios. And then, suddenly, along came "Oliver!"- an all-singing, all-dancing screen musical in the best Broadway/Hollywood tradition, made in Britain by a British studio with a British director and all-British cast. Far from resenting this invasion of what had traditionally been their territory, our American friends loved it so much that they gave it a "Best Picture" Oscar for 1968.I won't set out the plot because it is so well known. It is essentially that of "Oliver Twist" with a few alterations. The Monks subplot is omitted altogether. (No great loss). Oliver's home town, never named in the book, is established as Dunstable. (Dickens describes it as being about a hundred miles north of London, considerably further north than Dunstable. Was this change made to hide the fact that Mark Lester does not speak with the Midlands accent which Dickens' character would have had?)The biggest change is in the character of Fagin, portrayed here as a loveable old rogue rather than Dickens' cynical corrupter of youth. This change was probably motivated by concerns over Dickens' perceived anti-Semitism; both Lionel Bart, who wrote the stage musical on which the film was based and Ron Moody, who created the character of Fagin, were Jewish. When I first saw the film I did not like this change, but having seen the film again recently I am prepared to change my mind. Making Fagin into a kindly, if less-than-honest, father-figure may in fact have strengthened Dickens' theme of poverty as a cause of crime rather than weakening it. His boys invite the new arrival Oliver to "consider yourself one of the family", and whatever else Fagin may have done he has at least provided them with the only family they are ever likely to know. For them the only alternatives to life as part of this family are either beggary or a workhouse like the one from which Oliver has just escaped. Picking pockets is a minor crime compared to the ones of which the Victorian Establishment were guilty, like imprisoning paupers and orphans in workhouses. "Oliver!" was nominated for eleven Oscars and won six, a remarkable feat for any film but even more so for a British film which stars few, if any, actors who would have been internationally known in 1968. Moreover, few would have been household names even in Britain, apart from Oliver Reed (nephew of the director Carol Reed) as the thuggish criminal Bill Sikes and the well-loved, genial comedian Harry Secombe, cast against type as Mr Bumble, the pompous and heartless overseer of the workhouse. I have never thought that Lester, who comes across as too well-scrubbed and middle-class to be credible as a workhouse boy, was the ideal choice to play Oliver, but with that caveat the acting is generally of a very high standard, with fine contributions from Reed, Moody, Secombe and the young Jack Wild as the Artful Dodger. Special mention should go to Shani Wallis (an actress I have never seen in any other film) in the difficult role of Nancy. Nancy is a prostitute (although this aspect is played down in the film to keep the family audience), the associate of a gang of thieves and the mistress of a violent criminal. Yet she is also the film's heroine, someone with whom the audience must sympathise as she struggles to reconcile her innate decency with the realisation that the man with whom she has fallen in love is not just bad but irredeemably bad. Her dilemma is expressed in the film's most heart-rending song "As Long as He Needs Me", although Nancy also gives expression to the lighter, fun-loving side of her nature in "It's a Fine Life" and "Oom-Pah-Pah".The musical numbers are nearly all tuneful and memorable, with some fine lyrics. Besides those already mentioned the ones that stood out for me were "Food, Glorious Food", in which the workhouse boys sing of their hopes of a better (or at least better-fed) life, "You've Got to Pick a Pocket or Two" and "Reviewing the Situation", in both of which Fagin sets out his cynical philosophy of life, and screenplay directed by and "Consider Yourself" and "Who Will Buy?", both exuberant song-and-dance numbers set against a vividly recreated Victorian London. Yes, "Oliver!" can be sentimental at times, but that is something often associated with the musical genre, and also often with the novels of Dickens, a man never afraid to wring his readers' hearts. Watching the film again recently I was surprised by just how well it still stands up today, fifty years after it was made, as a rare example of the Great British Musical. 8/10A goof. One of Nancy's friends wears a bright purple dress. Later in the 19th century purple was to become a popular colour for all social classes, before the invention of synthetic dyes in the 1850s) there is no way a working-class girl could have afforded such a thing. At the time the film is set (the late 1830s), purple dye was notoriously expensive and reserved for the wealthy; there is a reason why royalty are said to be "born to the purple".
Going to today's movies feels like attending a barbaric assault on ones senses. There's the foul rotten language, the pervasive sex (heter, bi, trans and homo), the messages that 1) all humans are evil 2) the human condition is one of desperation and 3) the means justify the end. Oliver! transcends all of this with superb acting, script, direction and production. Oliver! is a masterpiece that will never die because its the epitome of quality. I went on line after seeing Oliver! and bought the Blu Ray disc off Amazon. It will now take a prominent position in my DVD collection. Thank you actors, directors, writers and producers for bringing the viewing public a reminder of how good movies can truly be, even when its this rare.
A lot of serious themes are breezed through and sung about in this musical adaptation of Oliver Twist. It covers child poverty and exploitation, a time where those in the orphanage were no less corrupt than the hucksters on the street. The scenes with Bill Sikes are quite violent and the violence against women is not a main theme but it does rear its ugly head. In fact, the song where the lady explains her illogical attraction to Bill by singing "He Needs Me" was a little bit too real and a sad reflection of what happens to many women in the real world. It's a good movie, a lot of fantastic characters and some great acting. But for me the serious undertones left me with mixed feelings. 7/10
Carol Reed directed this musical version of the Charles Dickens novel "Oliver Twist", which won Academy Awards for best picture and director(!) Mark Lester stars as Oliver, a young orphan forced into the streets and a life of crime when he meets up with the Artful Dodger(played by Jack Wild) and his boss Fagin(played by Ron Moody). Psychopathic Bill Sykes(played by Oliver Reed) is also a danger to Oliver, who just wants to find a loving home. Though this film has memorable songs like "Food Glorious Food", and a fine cast, it is fatally overlong and tedious, with over elaborate musical numbers that defy credibility. Not really the most appropriate material set to music, though that may be a minority opinion. How this beat out far worthier films for the Oscar is, as one critic observed, "One of the great mysteries of life here on spaceship Earth!"