Surprisingly incoherent and boring

One of my all time favorites.

Brilliant and touching

A great movie, one of the best of this year. There was a bit of confusion at one point in the plot, but nothing serious.

The amount of time spent to alter every car chase by simply creating a 1960's style "twice the speed" type car movement, in every case is absurd. Combined with a typical action movie style type of acting that is a combination of Tokyo Drift and Brazzers, this movie is most definitely one to skip. I just don't get, it you're gonna make a movie oriented movie that is all about the chase, why not get goot CGI instead of this?!

Before seeing Transporter 3, I expected it to be less cooler than The Transporter and Transporter 2 and I was amazed that I liked it more than its predecessors. I don't have any problems with it so I'm writing only what I liked about it.1)Jason Stathman is still a badass.2)Stathman delivers great non-CGI martial arts action scenes.3)The chase scenes are great as always.4)A great scene was one Frank's car was stolen and he ran to get it back.5)Many people probably hate Valentina but I enjoy her character. She was just trying to smile and was flirting.6)Inspector Tarconi gave the movie some great comedic relief.7)The plot is solid.8)The acting was nice.9)The script didn't seemed too bad.Overall I enjoyed Transporter 3 even more than the other two Transporter-s. From Bad 1 to Excellent 6 I give it EXCELLENT 6. By the way I won't be watching The Transporter Refueled, because I don't think I'll like the new transporter.

There is some aspects about this movie that I liked more than the previous 2 installmentsm, but there were some parts that I felt that it was weaker. What I liked about this movie is how they creativitely utilized the scenerios and action. When it comes to the protagonist having a bomb strapped around his hand. Which explodes if he is too far away from his car. So yeah, I thought the concept was cool, especially near the end. But it lacked the entertainment value, the previous two installment was over the top and ridiculous and this installment isn't as corny as the first one. But I just didn't find it as entertaining. But it still had my attention for the standard 1 hour and 30 minutes runtime. It still a watchable action movie for a rental.6.3/10

This is a sequel with no energy and a plot that focuses on all the wrong things. The girl that Frank is stuck with for most of the movie is obnoxious and a frustratingly horrible actress.This could have been a good movie. I mean, it's got Frank having to drive a girl around, with an explosive anklet that'll blast him to smithereens if he's separated from his car. And she's the daughter of a politician who's being blackmailed into signing some document to allow chemical ships to get into the country without a hassle. Oh, and it's got Robert Knepper, an underrated actor, playing the villain.Where did it go wrong? Maybe it was the fact this installment didn't match or surpass the fun ridiculousness of the first two (with the exception of Frank driving his car onto a train--and then THROUGH the train--to get to the bad guy). Or maybe it was the fact that the fight scenes were sped up (they literally fast-forwarded through some of the fights!) and blurry, with too many close-ups for you to tell just what the hell is going on. Oh, and that girl. That girl was terrible.Some people may enjoy this, but for me, it was a huge disappointment.