Alien³
After escaping with Newt and Hicks from the alien planet, Ripley crash lands on Fiorina 161, a prison planet and host to a correctional facility. Unfortunately, although Newt and Hicks do not survive the crash, a more unwelcome visitor does. The prison does not allow weapons of any kind, and with aid being a long time away, the prisoners must simply survive in any way they can.
-
- Cast:
- Sigourney Weaver , Charles S. Dutton , Charles Dance , Lance Henriksen , Paul McGann , Brian Glover , Ralph Brown
Similar titles
Reviews
Simply Perfect
Good story, Not enough for a whole film
Don't listen to the Hype. It's awful
The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.
It's David Fincher. And a really good cast that got railroaded by the execs. I was a little disappointed in '91, and glad a directors cut came out. Bravo, great addition.
Look this movie gets way too much hate because they killed off Ripley and Newt But it was a good movie; the cast was memorable, the xenomorph was legitimately scary, they subvert a lot of expectations, Sigourney Weaver delivered an incredible performance as Ripley; like always, the effects were great, and the suspense is well done.
Why so much hate maybe they need to view the forth installment again, alien3 had great Brit actors, great music reminded me of that Sean Connery film The Name Of The Rose that starred Ron Periman pity he didnt star in alien 3 instead of alien resurrection.
After the unsettling »Alien« (1979) and the bomastic »Aliens« (1986), »Alien 3« (1992) with its grim tone and slow pace initially looked like a huge dissapointment. It was David Fincher's directorial debut. Nowadays he has to be considered one of the masters of contemporary cinema. But this movie certainly didn't make a good first impression. There are some glaring flaws. First of all, it's unbelievably boring. The first half is slow, predictable and lifeless. It isn't even directed all that well. Today, Fincher is the king of suspense. But in »Alien 3« he works with some of the most tedious jumpscares I've ever seen on screen. It's embarrassing, really. No wonder Fincher himself doesn't like this movie.The alien itself is laughable. The special effects show their age, but not in a good way. »Alien 3« is CGI city. And this CGI makes the alien look like a lapdog, literally. It's just not frightening, and the whole movie feels like inflated trash. In recent years though, people seem to appreciate »Alien 3« more and more. Myself included. Some aspects of the movie work. The brooding atmosphere is well done, even if it makes the movie far less spectacular than its first two installments. The story has some nice themes, even if the overall arc is hamfisted and trivial. Fincher touches some difficult topics: rape, religion and gender. But the execution just isn't there. At the end of the day, »Alien 3« is a strange hybrid, stuck between shlock and arthouse.Because of that, it's one of a kind. If you want to watch a flawed yet interesting movie, »Alien 3« might be worth your time. But overall I'd say Fincher was right to expel his first feature film.