I love this movie so much

Just perfect...

There are moments in this movie where the great movie it could've been peek out... They're fleeting, here, but they're worth savoring, and they happen often enough to make it worth your while.

It is an exhilarating, distressing, funny and profound film, with one of the more memorable film scores in years,

This was so much better than I was expecting. This is was a movie that really pulled me into it. I loved that this was a nice slow burn and it is so refreshing to see a thriller/horror without a lot of cheap jump scares. It had a few moments of creepiness that was just right for making this a thriller. I held me in suspense. The actor played his part really well and even though this is a low budget movie, I only noticed a low budget "feel" a couple of times. I only have a couple gripes about it. I know that "Rosalind" is supposed to characterized as an eccentric personality but I didn't like that there was so much clutter found inside the house. I felt that they could have took some of that stuff out to open up the surroundings a bit more and it would've been just as effective. I also wasn't to crazy about the ending. I totally understood it but the way it ended left me a bit unsatisfied. I would suggest this to a friend.

I was disappointed and expected more. It covers the religious occult topic and adds some frights.Not very scary and low budget.The animation of the creature could have been better in 2016. Reminds me of a computer game animation.The good bit is the voice of Vanessa Redgrave.Storyline is good but it misses something.I stopped watching this after 50 mins because I got bored.The acting is OK but the setting appears to be quite limited but it has its moments to be fair.

There is too much exposition from the narrator to start with. Too much repetition. The idea of a dead person talking to someone is a very good one and could have been treated in a much more subtle manner. No need to say "I was lonely" 500 times. It only takes 1 to understand that she died a lonely person. It takes all the momentum from the ending.The camera following was quite interesting. Though at sometimes quite amateurish. Also there's a part where the camera is shooting at the closed door for way longer than it should. And that shot goes nowhere. It needed some reasonable resolution.The whole "ghostly presence" thing only had one good moment: when the little statue appeared behind the man in the basement, but again, no resolution for that shot either (ie, the motif didn't continue).There's a lot of walking around to reach nowhere.The "visiting man" had no resolution at all.As for the "dark creature": If the creature was the embodiment of the woman's loneliness in her later days in life, it makes little sense for the man as a child to be haunted by it. It would have worked quite beautifully if there was a moment in which all the "no resolution" moments came to one brief shot/movement related to the woman, and not to the man. After all, the man is there only to give some weight to the dead woman's narrative.To sum it up, it lacks many things that would make it a great movie. Desperation, Depression, Oppression. Everything related to loneliness and old-age.All these things aside, there are some good things about it. The props seemed somewhat overbearing, but I do know some people who's homes are filled with them to the roof. And, to be honest, some of those props were really good and added to the ambiance.The dark creature is well made (except it's shadow)

Don't be fooled by a few selected scene sets and ethereal camera movement in the first 5 mins, this film is shite. vanessa redgrave must have been being fingered in a back room to agree to anything to do with this, it's pathetic. total waste of money and time and effort to even pick the bits of tesco onion rings out of your nails. please don't bother, just watch your dog have a wet dream instead. this guy the only on screen actor must be pretty bald because his hair is permanently fixed to his head in a kind of trying not but really edging towards a silverkrin mega streanth comb over, if i was him i'd have booked a travelodge double room with a hooker in toe in 30 seconds after stepping into this house, which looked like a wickford rare detached with dodgy double glazing and 88 stone brick effect. this is early 90's crappy b going on c horror crap and is more forgettable than my foreign earbashed fat sweaty east London bus ride home.